Home
Financial Services Mktg
Financial Communicators
Thin Clients are In
Pay for Performance
Hedge Fund Firms
Funds-of-Funds Step Up Ops

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funds-of-Funds Step Up Ops Due Diligence

Article published on May 06, 2004 at Fundfire, www.fundfire.com
By Tom Stabile

Hedge funds-of-funds need to pay more attention to the business models, policies, and valuation practices of the underlying hedge fund managers in their portfolios. In many cases this means hiring additional staffers with auditing or business analyst backgrounds to delve deeper into the health of managers in which they invest assets.

The topic grabbed the focus of several speakers at the Financial Research Associates (FRA) “Hedge Fund Regulation and Compliance” conference held earlier this week in New York. They focused on how it could underpin a new Securities and Exchange Commission rule applying to funds-of-funds. It also has surfaced in personnel moves, such as the fund-of-funds Lighthouse Partners hiring an analyst dedicated to operational due diligence, and other firms recruiting for individuals who combine that role with other duties.

The SEC weighed in on the issue in the staff report on hedge funds issued last fall. In tandem with its centerpiece recommendation to require hedge fund managers to register as investment advisers, the staff also issued a call for the commission to require the boards of funds-of-funds to adopt procedures that ensure the underlying managers value their assets in accordance with federal securities law.

The SEC staff’s recommendation sounds a wakeup call for funds-of-funds, warns Michael Caccese, a partner at the New York law firm of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, who spoke at the conference and in an interview. “The SEC is very much emphasizing, even if you’re in a fund-of-funds, that you as the manager can’t necessarily rely on the net asset value that the underlying fund gives you,” he says.

That should trigger not just a review of pricing procedures, but also an operational review, he adds. “The SEC focuses on this,” Caccese says. “They’re totally paranoid about this.”

While the SEC recommendation for funds-of-funds has not gotten much publicity, it could have a significant impact on how they operate, says Anthony Artabane, partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers. He also spoke at the FRA conference and in a later interview.

Artabane says current practice is “uneven in terms of application” in the funds-of-funds marketplace, especially among firms not registered with the SEC. “There is a wide dispersion in terms of how rigorous the operational due diligence function is at these shops,” he says.

One reason for the varying practices, Artabane says, is that there are currently no requirements for funds-of-funds to analyze the business practices of the funds in which they invest. It remains unclear, he adds, whether the SEC’s much-awaited proposal on hedge fund regulation will include the funds-of-funds recommendation – and how far it would go. “The question becomes one of how fair it is to hold the fund-of-funds sponsor accountable for the very detailed pricing of the underlying funds,” Artabane says. “What’s a sufficient level of awareness of the policies?”

No matter what the level of review is, most funds-of-funds planning to buttress this function will need to hire staff. “This will require more infrastructure,” says Caccese.

Several searches for such positions have popped up within the last year, says Tom Kellerhals, senior partner at the Westminster Group, a recruiting firm in Chester, S.C. He attributes the moves to broader focus on business best practices by funds-of-funds, rather than SEC scrutiny per se. While he says such due diligence was always done to some degree, "it's starting to show up on everybody’s checklist."

“We’re in an environment where we look for everything that could go wrong,” he says. “People now understand there are all sorts of ways to provide a negative surprise. It makes sense in any due diligence process to look at the nature of the principals, to look at how the principals manage or don’t manage their business, to business continuity issues, who’s watching the store, how the store is being watched."

Kellerhals cites three models he has come across to date, and a fourth that he expects will also take hold. The first three all combine the operational due diligence duties with other positions in a fund-of-funds. One is a high-level role, with the CFO of a firm taking on the responsibility of conducting operational due diligence on the underlying managers. The second is having someone in the role of risk manager take on this business analysis role. The third is having an analyst charged with performance-based manager selection – focused on qualitative and quantitative analyses – also conduct the business analysis.

Kellerhals says he has filled the first two kinds, and is working on the third. In all cases, people with auditing or CPA backgrounds offer a good fit for the roles, but Kellerhals says the searches are typically trickier, since the firms are seeking specialized backgrounds that can be in short supply. “There is not a lot of supply when you say, ‘Find me a chief financial officer whose additional duty will be to do business accounting operational due diligence on managers that we have screened and have passed our quantitative and qualitative requirements,’” he says.

The fourth model, Kellerhals says, would be a staffer dedicated solely to operational due diligence. He has not come across this assignment yet, he adds. But that is precisely the role that Lighthouse Partners filled recently, as reported in FundFire. The hedge fund-of-funds based in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., has brought on a new analyst in its New York office to concentrate on digging into manager business models, including their front and back office relationships, third party providers, and accounting processes. The firm has pegged its effort to support its manager selection with operational due diligence as unique in the marketplace.

Among the issues that funds-of-funds can scout for, says Artabane, are whether the underlying firm has processes and procedures in place for proper valuation, appropriate documentation of those policies, and adequate disclosure of that information to investors. Other checkpoints are having strong models, third-party verification, board-level review, and the ability to flag and analyze changes to the models and procedures.